1l Geptember 2014
Prom: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To: Secretary of the Navy
sib: ay’ 3
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Enel: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 24 Feb 14 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 18 Aug 14
1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, .
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the fitness report for 12 July to 7 November
2013 (copy at Tab A).
2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Countryman and Messrs. Marquez and
Storz, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
ii September 2014, and pursuant To its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office with
cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s case has commented
to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable
CONCLUSTON:
11 the evidenc
the Board finds the existence
Light of enclosure (2),
justice warranting the following corrective action.
Upon review and consideration of a
especially in
of an error and in
RECOMMENDALLON:
That Petitioner's naval recor
a.
a related material:
Following fitness report an
Period of Report
From To
Reporting Senior
Date of Report
12 dul 13. 7 Nov 13
8 Nov 13
ecord 4@ memorandum in place
b. That ther
propriate identifying data
of the removed report,
concerning the “report; that the memorandum state that the report has
in accordance with
available to
and that such
the provisions ©
e of
tion boards and othe
jecture oY draw any in
t with or relating
ved or completely
entries or
ntries inconsisten
red, remo
hat no such
uLUre -
ial or e
commendation be correc
er's yecord and t
he record in the f
to the Board's re
expunged. from Petition
material be added to t
to be removed f
d, together with
a confidential file
s reference peing made a
aterial directed
4. That any ™
gd to the Boar
naval record be returne
Report of proceedings, for retention in
maintained for such purpose, with no cros
part of Petitioner's naval record.
qd Procedures of the Board
of the revise
£ Federal Regulations,
4, Pursuant to Secti
for Correction of (32 Code ot
tified that a quorum was present at che
Section 723.6(c)) it is cer
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing 1s a rue
ceedings in the above entitled
and complete record of the Board’ s pro
matter.
Pov tI ff lieben
JONATHAN 5. RUSKIN
Recorder
BY Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6 (e) ) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it 48 hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action taken under the authority of reference
fa), nas been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.
ROBERT J . O'NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3355 14
The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows: a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the following enlisted performance evaluation report and related material: Period of Report Date of Report Reporting Senior From To 14 Nov 12 16 Nov 11 15 Nov 12 b. e. That any material directed to be removed from Petitioner's naval record be returned to the Board, together with a copy of this Report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2686 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hedrick, Marquez and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (4), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, has commented to the effect that both contested fitness reports should be removed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4526 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 April to 31 December 2011 (copy at Tab A), the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS) entry reflecting his assignment to the Body Composition Program (BCP) from 4 August 2011 to 1 March 2012, and the service record page 11 counseling entry he received “due to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR0593 13
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 to 29% April 2011 (copy at Tab A), removing the service record page 1i (*Administrative Remarks (1070)") entries dated 1 December 2010 and 10 May 2011 (copies at Tab 3) and changing his reenlistment code from RE-3C (Commandant of the Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3743-13
Finally, by implication, he also requested removing the page 11 entry dated 3 August 2011. The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Gorenflo and Hicks, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11(b) (“Administrative Remarks...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10443-02
In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HQMC Career Management Team (CMT), the office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner her failures of selection for promotion, has commented to the effect that this request would warrant approval if the entire fitness report in question were to be removed. Chairperson, Performance Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8328 14
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the NUP of 21 November 2011. b. That Petitioner's record be further corrected by “-. e. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board’s recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner’s record and that no such entries or material be added to the record in the future.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7444 13
2, The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (5), PERS-81 stated that “an advisory to the petitioner’s request cannot be completed.” e. In enclosure (6), PERS-803, the NPC office with cognizance over enlisted advancements, has commented to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03680-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 21 August 2002 to 17 January 2003 (copy in enclosure (1) at Tab A) and the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 16 February 2003 (copy in enclosure (1) at Tab B).2. In enclosure (4), the HQMC Manpower Information Operations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3524 13
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hicks, Spooner and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 21 August 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. g. In enclosure (8), MIQ commented to the effect that in light of enclosure (7), the contested BCP assignment and page 11 entries should be removed. of enclosures (5) and (8), the Board finds the existence of an error...